<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Tue, 21 May 2013 20:09:30 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Archevore Blog - Comments</title><link>http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.158 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>JP comments on Jimmy Moore inquires about "safe starches"</title><author>JP</author><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 10:19:53 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/2011/9/29/jimmy-moore-inquires-about-safe-starches.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/15265706</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>One last question: how much should one at least be drinking every day? I think it&#39;s an interesting matter. Found no talk about it on the blog yet.</p>


<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>: Whiskey or water?</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Chris comments on Jimmy Moore inquires about "safe starches"</title><author>Chris</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/2011/9/29/jimmy-moore-inquires-about-safe-starches.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/15260119</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>If there is such a thing as &#39;overnutrition&#39; how do you explain ad libitum studies where people have consumed up to 4,000 calories per day and not gained weight? That&#39;s your black swan (well, one of many).</p>

<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>: </p>

<p>Please list for me all these peer reviewed studies that you claim show this.</p>

<p>Overnutrition is at the cellular level. </p>

<p>What do <span class="caps">YOU </span>think causes diabetes? </p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Mike P comments on Jimmy Moore inquires about "safe starches"</title><author>Mike P</author><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:33:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/2011/9/29/jimmy-moore-inquires-about-safe-starches.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/15255425</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr Harris</p>

<p>Your post was very interesting. But I wonder.</p>

<p>Can you explain what causes diabetes?</p>

<p>Is it vegetable oil consumption, high sugar consumption, or something else.</p>

<p>What causes diabetes?</p>

<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>:</p>

<p><span class="caps">NADS </span>via overnutrition, epigenetics, toxins</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Chris comments on Jimmy Moore inquires about "safe starches"</title><author>Chris</author><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:48:22 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/2011/9/29/jimmy-moore-inquires-about-safe-starches.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/15252853</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kurt,<br />
Question - if carbs don&#39;t <strong>cause</strong> diabetes, what does? Hypercalorism? A diet high in refined junk food?</p>
]]></description></item><item><title>Steve B comments on Jimmy Moore inquires about "safe starches"</title><author>Steve B</author><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:47:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.archevore.com/panu-weblog/2011/9/29/jimmy-moore-inquires-about-safe-starches.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">362664:3978518:comment/15246153</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>:</p>

<p>Regarding your insulin resistance question above, I didn&#39;t self-diagnose or get stuff off blogs.</p>

<p>The diagnosis comes from my thyroid/hormone dr in Torrance, Ca with the Holtorf Group. My fasting insulin in 2007 was over 14 (upper limit 7) and triglycerides were over 850.</p>

<p>I was directed to do very low carb, some supplements, I switched away from Synthroid to a T3 med, and some hormones like testosterone, <span class="caps">DHEA, </span>and a lot of <span class="caps">D3. </span></p>

<p>Now insulin is 4, trigs about 65, and I lost 120 lb. Something worked. </p>

<p>I have tried a few times to add what I consider safer carbs, which happens to match your own list-rice, white potatoes, and bananas. Weight creeps up and I stop these every time. There may be an explanation besides insulin resistance, but I don&#39;t know what it is. I&#39;m going with what I learned from my doc.</p>

<p>I read Mastering Leptin and it was interesting, but no help.</p>


<p><span class="caps">KGH</span>:</p>

<p>"Now insulin is 4, trigs about 65, and I lost 120 lb. Something worked. "</p>

<p>That is fantastic success. The lower fasting insulin is an effect of the fat loss and your improved <span class="caps">IS, </span>and could have occurred had you lost fat mass with any diet. I am not saying you would have lost as much with any other technique, I am saying that being insulin resistant is the effect of overnutrition and it is not specific to carbohydrate intake. </p>

<p>A fasting insulin of 4 is very healthy and indicates that you are <span class="caps">NOT </span>pathologically insulin resistant. You are able to keep your liver from flooding your body with glucose with a very small amount of basal insulin. This is the definition of having good insulin sensitivity.</p>

<p>So there is probably an explanation for your fat gain with starches, but it cannot be that you are insulin resistant, as you are not.</p>

<p>Have you tried eating them in bland fashion and while otherwise limiting FR?</p>
]]></description></item></channel></rss>